Skip to main content.

Archives

This is the archive for June 2006

OPEN THREAD (Week 6/19-6/23)

As they say on The DailyKos: chew it up, spit it out...

Comments on All the President's Men should go here.

And, if you've finished reading "1984"...
I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace. We want there to be peace. We want people to live in peace all around the world. I mean, our vision for peace extends beyond America. We believe in peace in South Asia. We believe in peace in the Middle East. We're going to be steadfast toward a vision that rejects terror and killing, and honors peace and hope. -- George W. Bush
Read the entire speech from 6/18/02.

Check out: SOS: Students for an Orwellian Society. It's a great site! Especially the translated goodspeak news Fox News Site.

Check out the site for the documentary The War Tapes...the first war movie filmed by soldiers themselves. There is also a trailer for the film.

And, check out this upcoming film release: The Road to Guantanomo.

Shantanu's Diary

Technology has truly taken over the lives of many in this fast paced world. It remains debatable to the extent of its locus of control and operation. Is it beneficial or harmful? Well,that is not the issue I would like to discuss about. If one were to notice, blogging, podcasting, live streaming and radio and more such options are becoming readily available to the public. This is infecting and breeding in the minds of the multitude as fast as any disease, only, it is not a disease. Lets hope not, since some consider dependance on technology and its peripherals a disease.
If one was to read off the screens and obtain all information from it, then what would be the need of newspapers?Why should we want to purchase a tangible and cumbersome item when it can be purchased online in a much more simple and convinient way???Besides, more paper means more and more trees!!!

Klaus' Diary

The war on terrorism has finally taken progress! About two and a half weeks ago an F-16 fighter jet managed to fire a bomb on the hide out of Mohammed Al Zarqawi, then America’s most wanted terrorist and consequently killed him. It was clearly a break through in international terrorism and therefore a victory for the western world.
Mohammed Al-Zarqawi dead

So did anyone watch news that day? If you did, you will most likely agree that no matter what else was going on in the world on the 8th of June did not get any media attention at all.
But that was not the first time something like this has happened, after all “breaking news” is probably the most commonly mentioned sentence in US news. Whenever something in relation to the war on terrorism happens, world news has a shut down. Even if something important happened during that day, the average American, who relies on television news, would never find out about it. Therefore the question arises, whether the continuation of this type of “information blockage” could harm US society in the long run and to what extent we can continue to rely on television news.

OPEN THREAD (Week 6/12-6/16)

What's on your mind???
Discussions of An Inconvenient Truth are most welcome here!

Etka has inspired me to post this wonderful image!

Earth


Check out (NYT registration required):
Science Panel Backs Study on Warming Climate

eNewspapers: Control, Progress, and the Press

The Wizda reading for this week deals with the perception of The Times' local news reporting and their model for success. There is something to be said about the need for local news. However, despite the numerous awards bestowed on The Times, more mainstream news outlets and journalists still regard the local paper as nothing more than a collection of fluff pieces. The one main advantage that The Times has over the larger papers is how they write their stories. They use narrative devices and allow stories to be lengthy to create a more natural exposition of all the key players and facts.

Now, the Kunkel reading deals with something else to watch for: the mobile digital enewspaper.

From eInk From eInk From eInk

The images above show the current progress that the E Ink Corporation has made in developing this technology. For more information, visit the E Ink Corp. Website.

According to Frank Aherns in his "Ink and Paper or 1s and 0s" (Washington Post registration required)

Storytelling will change (sic). Long articles such as this, with complete sentences and linguistic device, likely will dwindle in number and be restricted to the remaining newspapers and e-papers. News on small screens, such as that of your cell phone, will spit out in headlines and blurbs and sentences without articles: "Mars rodent attacks NASA probe."

Much like what is seen in Spielberg's film "Minority Report":

Minority Report
Minority Report

Newspapers vs. eNewspapers

Newspapers and eNewspapers are two different things. First of all, people are used to the newspapers that they receive every morning. Unfortunately, according to the [readings] it seems that newspapers do not really spur discussion when they are written. The articles are given straightforward and there are many of them put forth for the public. The difference with e-newspapers is that people can receive information on the go and at their convenience straight from their hand held devices. The problem now exists that when reading on these hand held devices news articles are more general stating the headlines and not much more of the article it holds. On the other hand, these e-newspaper articles have created a new way to get news. In addition, people can also see the discussions and such blogs associated with these e-newspapers. This spurs more independent thinking for the individual and allows one to see many angles of the story instead of the newspaper, such as the Times, presents it straightforward indicating how it is.

The Economist: Blogging off

Click Here For Article
This article basically deals with the importance of blogging for companies today. Now that Blogs exist, companies might as well take advantage of them as a medium to promote themselves; well that is, if they manage to maintain a certain standard for their customers and their employees.
Blogging allows staff to build a personal brand separate from that of their firm; if they are good at it, and build up a readership, that brand may be more valuable to them elsewhere

That is the beauty of Blogs, they allow consumers to have some control over companies’ actions and apparently employees are also taking advantage of this new technological advance to speak their minds. Scoble, a former Microsoft employee was one of the biggest Corporate Bloggers out there; he freely criticized Microsoft’s products as well as its media strategies on his own blog called Scobleizer.
He helped write a book, “Naked Conversations: How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk With Customers”, published in January, that has become essential reading for any boss trying to define a new-media strategy for his business."

As it seems, Scoble quit Microsoft just at the right time, and now moved on to the apparent “pot of gold business”, PodTech.net, the hottest version of Blogs.

I think that it is incredible how we can now speak our minds, but I wonder how much this will last if e-mail and instant messaging in most offices is now prohibited…Will huge Corporations try to take control of Blogging as well, by firing workers? And do you think that Blogs are for the best? What do you think...
Or what happens if on the contrary, sites of public opinion finally do take over the media, are we going to have to rely on the public for news? Can Blogs actually lead to the demise of existing media and of Corporations for that matter?

The horrors of war...

(This has nothin to do with my topic, but it's a funny
photo)... (Germany 1, England 0.. ha ha);
Photo via Yahoo Link
This is not for the faint hearted...
If you are sensitive, You can still comment on the topic
without having to watch the clips...
The first clip is 100 times easier to watch than the second...
Both are about the beheadings of american/english
prisoners... the Iraq war was responisble...
1st clip= Old English guy, gets a "mercy execution"...
FIRST CLIP
2nd guy is american.. Gets the worse death ever imagined
SECOND CLIP

1. Is it possible to rationalize this behaviour in the
21st century???? Why couldn't they have just shot him??
2. Do events like this change the American perception
on the war in Iraq... for better or worse???????
3.Should events like this be shown on the 11pm news????
4. To counter point myself... (nomad style)
To what extent should the U.S. TV NEWS report about
the events that went on in the Iraqi prisons...
IRAQI PRISONS= Sexual humiliation, torture, etc etc
Is there a double standard going on...

Any other opinions are most welcome... hence the purpose
of a blogging site...

Ananya's Diary

Today cellphones are carrying that 'simple tracking device'; tomorrow it could be something else. Although the article suggests that this new technology is primarily for parents who wish to keep a leash on their children, it could be used for other purposes. The US government is already tapping phone lines, and now one has the option to track a person's whereabouts, without his/her knowledge. How much are we going to allow our privacy to be constantly invaded? If technologies such as this are already available, how many more restraints can we possibly have on our personal lives? Read the complete article here:

Cell Phones: Just a Leash for Children? (Chicago Tribune)

Note: this article originally appeared in the LA Times.

Newspeak as Frame

"If you hate violence and don't believe in politics, the only major remedy remaining is education. Perhaps society is past praying for, but there is always hope for the individual human being."
-- George Orwell
Cartoon
- 1949 NBC radio adaptation of Orwell's 1984
- Radio host Mike Malloy reads Orwell's 1984 (download MP3s)

Since we will be talking about radio/audio, I thought it might be interesting to check out the above audio links.

Since Punhal brought up issues of morality in his diary, I thought it fitting to start the discussion more intensely on the use and role of "framing," especially in applying 1984 to present day media.

More on the flip...

OPEN THREAD (Week 6/5-6/9)

What's on your mind from the past week?

Oh boy...

Defeat for net neutrality backers (BBC News)
"US politicians have rejected attempts to enshrine the principle of net neutrality in legislation. Some fear the decision will mean net providers start deciding on behalf of customers which websites and services they can visit and use...The House defeated the amendment by 269 votes to 152.

Today's content of "Breaking News"

A few days ago, the title Spelling Bee Gets New Queen was under the Latest News section on CNN.com. this article is about a 13 year old who took home the title of America's best speller. The competition was aired on prime-time television.

Isn't CNN supposed to inform the public of much more important breaking news? When one relies on a source such as CNN when skimming for daily news, is a topic such as the Spelling Bee Championships important enough to be on the front page?

Are we entitled to blame the general public who relies on such sources for being "dumb" when they should be aware of a current important topic, and are not? Who is the audience of CNN? Parents? Is that what CNN is doing too... molding their content according to public interest? I wonder if this will affect our intellect level in the long run...

Cable Companies Begin to Fear Internet

IPTV, Web Video and Portable Media are making the cable companies very scared. At first cable providers were only cautious about Satellite TV but now major Web Companies such as Google and Yahoo!, consumer electronic companies like Sony and Apple and lastly wireless providers are giving cable networks a run for their money.

One technology analyst states, "In addition, cable technologists see rising competition from peer-to-peer file-sharing services, whether they're video-related or not. In a prime example of a non-video threat over broadband, they worry about the growing presence of Skype, the popular Luxembourg-based VoIP provider whose software enables free phone calls over the Internet. E-Bay recently bought Skype for an eye-popping $2.6 billion in cash and stock."
Click Here For the Article

In a couple of years down the road, I predict that cable providers such as comcast will lose their phone,data and cable packages and will only offer a broadband or high speed fiber optics service. Recently, my family has switched over to voice over IP phone service and I cannot tell a difference. My cell phone now has streaming audio and video and also VOIP when connected to wi-fi. Lastly, to make things worse for our cable service, my Ipod when connected to the tv, plays DVD quality movies.

Consider these questions:
How has the advent of new technology affected the way you receive forms of media?
What should the cable companies do to combat their online competitors?

Guilty until proven innocent

It seems that the media is willing to not only report the news but wants to be the jury as well. This is a "right wing" report but it does bring up certain questions about the medias role in now only the war in Iraq but also in the criminal justice system. This Blog tells the story of a Representitive who held a press conference because he claims to know the outcome of the report on the Marines in Haditha. (If you don't know the story read here: www.washingtonpost.com
The media has jumped on the story proclaiming the marines guilty before any trial or court martial takes place. The rest of the blog rails against the "liberal" media but it does pose some interesting questions.

Read here www.webcommentary.com

1) The United States Constitution guarantees a fair trial beginning with the philosophy that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty. With the media reporting things like this does it make it harder for anyone to get a fair trial?

2) Is the media hypocritical when it claims that its reporting in protected by the 1st Ammedment but seems to be violating a persons 6th Ammendment.

3) Does the public's right to know outweigh the person's rights?

Media Manipulation

Is the news really the news anymore?
News, today is getting more dilute as we make progression into tomorrow’s world. More than actual fact, or real stories, the news is made up of a meticulous combination of government-produced stories, corporate sponsored stories and an industry of public relation firms at work pushing all sorts of agendas to the public.

The government has been engaged in prepackaging the news using reports that have been produced to show the government in optimal light creating segments that are made to look like real news reports, and on most occasions there is no mention that the report was paid by the government.

Public relation firms have also been hard at work pushing stories to the public by paying broadcasters, selling wars for the government and overall, generating domestic and international propaganda.

Please click this article to get to the link.

Under the Bush administration, the federal government has aggressively used a well-established tool of public relations: the prepackaged, ready-to-serve news report that major corporations have long distributed to TV stations to pitch everything from headache remedies to auto insurance. In all, at least 20 federal agencies, including the Defense Department and the Census Bureau, have made and distributed hundreds of television news segments in the past four years, records and interviews show. Many were subsequently broadcast on local stations across the country without any acknowledgement of the government’s role in their production.

Readings on Net Neutrality

READ: Save the Internet Coalition's FAQ on Net Neutrality

READ: Bipartisan Majority Supports Internet Freedom in the House

WATCH: Moby/Rep. Ed Markey Video (it's the first one listed)

OPEN THREAD (Week 5/29-6/2)

Use this area to make any further comments, ask questions, post links, or discuss film clips from class. This is an open thread, meaning general comments about the previous week's discussion continues.

Keith Olbermann Cites Bill O'Reilly on Startling Inaccuracies

Keith Olbermann's "Countdown" (via Crooks and Liars)

Watch this clip (requires QuickTime movie player) from Olbermann's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" (MSNBC).

It was reported by Olbermann that the Fox News Web site detailing a transcript of this O'Reilly factor segment was altered because the information given by O'Reilly on the air was wrong and misleading.

QUESTIONS:

  1. What is at issue here is when newscasters become part of the news. Why do you think this is becoming more common and what is at stake for the public's trust in newscasters?
  2. What are the ramifications when what is reported or stated is blatantly incorrect and damaging to others?

Punhal's Diary

In examining the progress of our species, or at least the development of technologies that we have come to construe as progress, we must not lose the concept of a larger historical perspective and the ramifications of such progress when referenced with our extensive past. The advent of the global industrial revolution instigated a process that continues to this day and is self perpetuating. The evolution of media culture was and is closely linked to and vital to the continuation of this process/progress. From the largely print societies that precipitated colonialism and the concept of the "white man's burden," to the current state of global interaction and isolation, media has, in its varying forms, given voice and shape to societies' missions, philosophies, art, and much much more in today's world. The people of the world were at one point motivated by ideologies larger than themselves; this was most evident, perhaps, in the oral traditions of old and the earliest instances of printed or written matter.

The question I wish to pose is how has our 'progress' effected our physical world and whether we have lost sight of the moral ideologies, whichever they may be, that did and should govern human society?

"Suicide is Painless"

Please watch the following clip
video image

My boyfriend works for Grey advertising in NYC. They are currently
working on a campaign for the advertising portion of the Cannes Film
Festival. The main point of their campaign is that TV is dead and that
the Internet is taking over. They were shooting pictures of "TV's
killing themselves" when he decided to take a movie of one of the
photo shoots with his camera. He then linked the movie to a website,
portraying it as a real suicide (sick, I know). The video received over 700 hits in less than 2 days after being posted on four different websites.

The vast amount of traffic to this site in such a short amount of time begs the questions:

How much we read on the Internet is actually accurate?
How much is conjured?
What are the motives behind people posting such videos?
What is the motivation to watch such "graphic" videos?
Are the American people slowly brainwashing each other?


How Screwed Up Is The TV Business?

Arrested Development, a comedy on FOX, is highly critically acclaimed, and has even won an Emmy. Regardless of such honors, however, the show received low ratings in it's first two seasons. In February 2005, FOX reduced the show's episode count from 22 to 18. This sparked the widespread rumor that the show would be cancelled after it's second season. Consequently, a great number of Arrested Development fans wrote letters, e-mails, and even websites (such as Save Our Bluths) in an effort to save the show.

Of course, FOX is a business, and, as such, has a right to make decisions that are in their own best interest. However, the fact that they reduced the episode count for (and allegedly considered cancelling) one of their most highly regarded shows reveals their priorities regarding programming.


How screwed up is the TV business? Here's the logic behind the Fox decision: Bad is not bad. Bad is good. Because good could have turned out bad, and that would have been really bad.

Translation: Cutting back is a business decision that doesn't reflect on the show's creativity. We know you want to be on in May, but if the numbers aren't good against super-stiff sweeps competition, the chances of getting picked up for a third season drop exponentially.

Read the rest of this article from the San Francisco Chronicle here

Ultimately, FOX did renew Arrested Development for a third season. However, the questions that I believe were raised by this whole situation are: (1) Should television networks give priority to quality, award-winning shows or popular, highly-rated shows? (2) Are television networks too eager to cancel new shows that don't catch on right away? (3) Who is to blame in a situation like this (scheduling, marketing, viewers (or lack thereof), etc)?

FCC to Investigate Fake News

Fake News (via Center for Democracy in Media)

According to the Center for Media and Democracy:

Bloomberg reports that, in direct response to CMD's groundbreaking exposé 'Fake TV News,' the "Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin ordered a probe of dozens of television stations. ... The April report by the non-profit Center for Media and Democracy found at least 77 stations, including 23 affiliates of Walt Disney Co.'s ABC network and seven Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. stations, ignored an FCC warning to disclose sponsors. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500, rising to $325,000 for multiple infractions, said FCC spokesman Clyde Ensslin. 'If the investigation leads to significant fines, the FCC could cause stations to put disclosures in place that make clearer the corporate role in local news,' said analyst Blair Levin of Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Washington. 'It depends how hard Martin wants to push it.'"

What this means in a nutshell: corporations are paying for and supplying VNRs (Video News Releases) to television networks that appear to be in the public interest but include a touting for their products or services. A summary of their findings can be found here (click "Video Footage" in the report to see all examples). For example, once such broadcast on Internet phishing ("A Fake News Report About Fake E-mail") can be viewed here: the original VNR, an unedited version by a Fox News affiliate, and an edited version by a WB affiliate. It was paid for by Trend Micro Software where "the report recommended PC-Cilin, a $50 Internet security program from Trend Micro, as 'a first line of defense" against phishing scams.'"
buy cialis buy cheap viagra Animal trank